Skip to content

Contextual Dimension

Contextual

Learning objective

By the end of this page you'll be able to configure all four Contextual-dimension factors, understand why they're entered as a single national number rather than a spatial dataset, and know which published index backs each one.

The Contextual Dimension refers to the laws and policies that shape workplace gender discrimination, financial autonomy, and overall gender empowerment. Although this dimension may vary between countries due to differences in legal frameworks, it remains consistent within a single country, as national policies and regulations are typically applied uniformly across countries. For more information on data input used from open sources, see the Getting Data tutorial.

National Index Score technique: one published value filled across every cell

Every Contextual factor uses the National Index Score technique (see Processor Types): a researched national score typed straight into the factor's dialog, no spatial dataset involved. Configure each one using the pattern from Configuring Items: double-click, enter the score, then right-click → Run Item Workflow. See Getting Data for how that number is calculated and entered.

Input Contextual factors


Generic analysis: the EPLEX score

EPLEX is a summary measure of Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) stringency, created by the International Labour Organization (ILO), that measures how strongly a country's laws protect workers against dismissal at the initiative of an employer.

Contextual Weights

Enter the EPLEX score as a fraction between 0 and 1 (the tool multiplies it by 5 to put it on the usual 0–5 scale); if you already have a value on the 0–5 scale from an older project, you can enter that directly and it's used as-is.


Women's Enabling Environments analysis: the WBL database

For a Women's Enabling Environments analysis, GeoE3 uses data from the WBL (Women, Business and the Law) database instead:

Workplace Discrimination involves laws that address gender biases and stereotypes that hinder women's career advancement, especially in male-dominated fields. It's obtained from the Workplace Index score of the WBL.

Regulatory Frameworks pertain to laws and policies that protect women's employment rights, such as childcare support and parental leave, influencing their workforce participation. This indicator is composed by the Pay and Parenthood Index score of the WBL database.

Financial Inclusion involves laws concerning women's access to financial resources like loans and credit, which is crucial for starting businesses and investing in economic opportunities. This indicator is composed by the Entrepreneurship Index score of the WBL 2024.

The WBL index scores are already 0–100, so you enter the published value directly and GeoE3 converts it to the usual 0–5 scale for you:

WBL score GeoE3 score Colour
95 – 100 5
90 – 94 4
80 – 89 3
75 – 79 2
60 – 74 1
0 – 59 0

As a rough feel for the scale: a country with strongly enabling legislation would score in the 90s; something clearly below that reflects whatever gap you've identified in your research.

Default scores by country

If you'd rather skip the lookup entirely, the table below gives the Workplace Discrimination, Regulatory Frameworks (average of the WBL Pay and Parenthood scores) and Financial Inclusion score for every country WBL covers, straight from the WBL 2024 report year (data current as of October 1, 2023). WBL adds and revises countries each year; if you need a different (later) report year, or a country that isn't listed below, look it up directly at wbl.worldbank.org.

Economy Workplace Discrimination Regulatory Frameworks Financial Inclusion
Afghanistan 50 10 75
Albania 100 90 100
Algeria 75 55 75
Angola 100 55 100
Antigua and Barbuda 50 47.5 75
Argentina 75 55 75
Armenia 75 87.5 75
Australia 100 100 100
Austria 100 100 100
Azerbaijan 100 65 100
Bahamas, The 100 47.5 75
Bahrain 75 70 100
Bangladesh 50 22.5 75
Barbados 100 45 75
Belarus 50 65 75
Belgium 100 100 100
Belize 75 55 75
Benin 100 67.5 100
Bhutan 100 70 75
Bolivia 75 80 100
Bosnia and Herzegovina 100 65 100
Botswana 25 37.5 75
Brazil 100 77.5 75
Brunei Darussalam 25 37.5 75
Bulgaria 100 100 100
Burkina Faso 100 52.5 100
Burundi 100 70 75
Cabo Verde 100 57.5 100
Cambodia 100 47.5 100
Cameroon 75 52.5 50
Canada 100 100 100
Central African Republic 100 45 75
Chad 75 55 50
Chile 75 87.5 75
China 100 62.5 75
Colombia 100 75 75
Comoros 75 70 75
Congo, Dem. Rep. 100 65 100
Congo, Rep. 75 22.5 75
Costa Rica 100 80 75
Croatia 100 100 100
Cyprus 100 87.5 100
Czechia 100 100 100
Côte d'Ivoire 100 90 100
Denmark 100 100 100
Djibouti 100 55 100
Dominica 25 25 75
Dominican Republic 100 67.5 100
Ecuador 100 70 75
Egypt, Arab Rep. 75 10 100
El Salvador 100 77.5 100
Equatorial Guinea 75 80 0
Eritrea 100 47.5 75
Estonia 100 100 100
Eswatini 25 35 0
Ethiopia 100 42.5 100
Fiji 100 55 75
Finland 100 90 100
France 100 100 100
Gabon 100 90 100
Gambia, The 50 67.5 75
Georgia 100 77.5 100
Germany 100 100 100
Ghana 100 35 75
Greece 100 100 100
Grenada 50 60 75
Guatemala 25 55 75
Guinea 100 35 100
Guinea-Bissau 25 47.5 25
Guyana 100 70 100
Haiti 50 70 75
Honduras 100 35 100
Hong Kong SAR, China 100 67.5 100
Hungary 75 87.5 100
Iceland 100 100 100
India 100 32.5 75
Indonesia 100 57.5 75
Iran, Islamic Rep. 0 55 75
Iraq 100 35 100
Ireland 100 100 100
Israel 100 55 100
Italy 100 100 100
Jamaica 75 35 75
Japan 50 62.5 75
Jordan 75 70 100
Kazakhstan 50 77.5 75
Kenya 100 70 75
Kiribati 100 60 75
Korea, Rep. 100 52.5 100
Kosovo 100 80 100
Kuwait 75 0 75
Kyrgyz Republic 100 32.5 100
Lao PDR 75 67.5 100
Latvia 100 100 100
Lebanon 100 35 75
Lesotho 75 47.5 75
Liberia 100 60 75
Libya 50 57.5 75
Lithuania 100 100 100
Luxembourg 100 100 100
Madagascar 100 32.5 75
Malawi 100 70 75
Malaysia 50 67.5 75
Maldives 100 57.5 100
Mali 50 55 75
Malta 100 77.5 100
Marshall Islands 50 50 100
Mauritania 25 42.5 75
Mauritius 100 80 100
Mexico 100 67.5 100
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 25 37.5 75
Moldova 100 100 100
Mongolia 100 100 100
Montenegro 100 65 100
Morocco 100 65 100
Mozambique 100 55 100
Myanmar 25 55 75
Namibia 75 57.5 75
Nepal 100 70 75
Netherlands 100 100 100
New Zealand 100 90 100
Nicaragua 100 57.5 100
Niger 75 55 50
Nigeria 75 25 75
North Macedonia 100 65 100
Norway 100 100 75
Oman 50 55 75
Pakistan 100 35 75
Palau 25 37.5 75
Panama 100 65 75
Papua New Guinea 50 12.5 75
Paraguay 100 90 100
Peru 100 90 100
Philippines 100 80 100
Poland 100 100 100
Portugal 100 100 100
Puerto Rico 100 47.5 100
Qatar 0 25 75
Romania 100 100 100
Russian Federation 50 65 75
Rwanda 100 80 100
Samoa 100 57.5 75
San Marino 50 87.5 75
Saudi Arabia 100 70 100
Senegal 100 65 75
Serbia 100 100 100
Seychelles 50 77.5 75
Sierra Leone 100 80 100
Singapore 75 67.5 75
Slovak Republic 100 87.5 100
Slovenia 100 87.5 100
Solomon Islands 25 12.5 75
Somalia 50 45 75
South Africa 100 90 100
South Sudan 100 70 75
Spain 100 100 100
Sri Lanka 75 22.5 75
St. Kitts and Nevis 25 45 75
St. Lucia 100 70 75
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 25 35 75
Sudan 0 10 75
Suriname 100 67.5 50
Sweden 100 100 100
Switzerland 100 90 75
Syrian Arab Republic 25 20 75
São Tomé and Príncipe 100 67.5 75
Taiwan, China 100 90 75
Tajikistan 50 65 100
Tanzania 100 80 75
Thailand 100 47.5 75
Timor-Leste 75 80 75
Togo 100 90 100
Tonga 25 37.5 75
Trinidad and Tobago 50 47.5 100
Tunisia 75 32.5 75
Türkiye 100 77.5 75
Uganda 100 70 75
Ukraine 100 40 100
United Arab Emirates 100 80 100
United Kingdom 100 90 100
United States 100 77.5 100
Uruguay 100 77.5 75
Uzbekistan 50 80 100
Vanuatu 25 25 100
Venezuela, RB 100 77.5 75
Viet Nam 100 90 100
West Bank and Gaza 25 0 75
Yemen, Rep. 25 12.5 75
Zambia 100 70 100
Zimbabwe 100 57.5 100

Citation: World Bank. 2024. Women, Business and the Law 2024. Washington, DC: World Bank. Topic-level scores (Workplace, Pay, Parenthood, Entrepreneurship) drawn from the WBL 2024 historical panel dataset: WBL2024-1-0-Historical-Panel-Data.xlsx, available from the WBL download data page.

Note

WBL restructured its methodology starting with the 2026 report ("WBL 2.0"), scoring three pillars (legal frameworks, supportive frameworks, enforcement perceptions) per topic instead of one flat score. The topic-level scores this table uses are only published under the earlier ("1.0") methodology, which is why this table is pinned to the 2024 report year rather than the latest one.


Once every factor has a value, double-click the Contextual dimension and follow the same generic pattern as every other item in the tree: assign weights, balance them, and run it.

Contextual Final Output

The outputs (Workplace Discrimination, Regulatory Frameworks and Financial Inclusion, plus their aggregation into the final Contextual score) land in the Contextual folder within your project folder, on the usual 0–5 enablement scale.

Recap

  • All four Contextual factors (EPLEX Score for a generic analysis; Workplace Discrimination, Regulatory Frameworks and Financial Inclusion for a Women's Enabling Environments analysis) are entered as a single national number, not a spatial dataset.
  • Workplace Discrimination, Regulatory Frameworks and Financial Inclusion map to three different WBL 2024 sub-indices (the Workplace, Pay and Parenthood, and Entrepreneurship index scores respectively). Don't reuse the same number for all three.
  • Results combine into a single Contextual output on the usual 0–5 enablement scale, viewable as a mutually-exclusive layer group.