Key References
Definition: What are durables?
Why measure durables?
How to measure durables?
Flow of services
User cost of durables
Data requirements
Caveats
Conclusion
Deaton, A., and S. Zaidi. 2002. "Guidelines for constructing consumption aggregates for welfare analysis." LSMS Working Paper No. 135,
Amendola, N., and G. Vecchi. 2014. "Durable goods and poverty measurement." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7105.
Deaton, A., and S. Zaidi. 2002. "Guidelines for constructing consumption aggregates for welfare analysis." LSMS Working Paper No. 135,
Amendola, N., and G. Vecchi. 2014. "Durable goods and poverty measurement." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7105.
A durable good is a consumption good that can deliver useful services to a consumer through repeated use over an extended period of time (Diewert, 2009)
A consumer durable is a good that may be used for purposes of consumption repeatedly or continuously over a period of a year or more (SNA, 200).
A durable good is a consumption good that can deliver useful services to a consumer through repeated use over an extended period of time (Diewert, 2009)
A consumer durable is a good that may be used for purposes of consumption repeatedly or continuously over a period of a year or more (SNA, 200).
The main characteristic of a durable good does not depend on its physical durability (property shared by many other consumption goods), but by the fact that, like capital goods, it is productive for two or more periods.
Example: coal is highly durable in a physical sense but it can be burnt just once.
Long-lived goods (automobiles, appliances, furniture) have a positive and significant impact on living standards.
Time-saving (e.g. household appliances, transport means)
Entertainment (TV, DVD, etc) and communications (Phones)
Long-lived goods (automobiles, appliances, furniture) have a positive and significant impact on living standards.
Time-saving (e.g. household appliances, transport means)
Entertainment (TV, DVD, etc) and communications (Phones)
Poor households sometimes devote some expenditures to non-food items, including durable goods (Haughton and Khandker, 2009)
Long-lived goods (automobiles, appliances, furniture) have a positive and significant impact on living standards.
Time-saving (e.g. household appliances, transport means)
Entertainment (TV, DVD, etc) and communications (Phones)
Poor households sometimes devote some expenditures to non-food items, including durable goods (Haughton and Khandker, 2009)
Their inclusion ensures utility consistency.
Long-lived goods (automobiles, appliances, furniture) have a positive and significant impact on living standards.
Time-saving (e.g. household appliances, transport means)
Entertainment (TV, DVD, etc) and communications (Phones)
Poor households sometimes devote some expenditures to non-food items, including durable goods (Haughton and Khandker, 2009)
Their inclusion ensures utility consistency.
Failure to include durable goods may underestimate inequality (to be discussed later).
Long-lived goods (automobiles, appliances, furniture) have a positive and significant impact on living standards.
Time-saving (e.g. household appliances, transport means)
Entertainment (TV, DVD, etc) and communications (Phones)
Poor households sometimes devote some expenditures to non-food items, including durable goods (Haughton and Khandker, 2009)
Their inclusion ensures utility consistency.
Failure to include durable goods may underestimate inequality (to be discussed later).
Do you think of any other reason?
There is an inconsistency between the reference period and the period of time in which durable goods deliver their utility to the consumer.
There is an inconsistency between the reference period and the period of time in which durable goods deliver their utility to the consumer.
There is an inconsistency between the reference period and the period of time in which durable goods deliver their utility to the consumer.
According to Deaton (1997, 151), "we need to decide the reference period for welfare measurement, whether someone is poor if they go without adequate consumption or income for a week, a month, or a year"
According to Deaton (1997, 151), "we need to decide the reference period for welfare measurement, whether someone is poor if they go without adequate consumption or income for a week, a month, or a year"
According to Deaton (1997, 151), "we need to decide the reference period for welfare measurement, whether someone is poor if they go without adequate consumption or income for a week, a month, or a year"
Market price of a durable good is not adequate because the it corresponds to the value of its entire economic life, while what we need is the value of the use during the period of reference.
Principle: we need to estimate the consumption flow of durable goods, which is the benefit accruing to the household from the ownership of durable goods, limited to the reference period.
When it comes to measuring living standards, poverty and inequality, the estimation of the value of consumer durables is also crucial. The use of the purchase price instead of the consumption flow leads to overestimate the effect of economic cycle on the household welfare, to underestimate absolute poverty, and most likely to bias the poverty profile (Deaton and Zaidi 2002).
A well-documented study on Russia, for instance, shows that the impact on inequality can be very large: the Gini index of expenditure increases from 32 percent to 44 percent when the full purchase value of durables is included instead of its use value (World Bank 2005: 9)
The durables’ service flow exceeds the reference period of the welfare aggregate
The purchasing price reflects the value of the durable for its entire life
Need to capture the value of the flow of the service during the reference period
The consumption flow could be represented as follows,
CFt=ksv,t×psv,t
where,
psv,t is the market price of the good in time t;
ksv,t is a fraction of the market price,
(t−v) refers the year in which the good was manufactured;
(t−s) the year in which the good was purchased.
Acquisition approach
Rental equivalence
User cost
If the good is purchased during the reference period, its entire value is attributed to the household welfare aggregate.
ksv,t(a)={1 if s=00 if s>0
CF=0 if household does not purchase the durable good during time t (i.e., s>0),
CFt=P0v,t, otherwise.
P0v,t captures the current value of all services provided by the durable good. So,...
If the good is purchased during the reference period, its entire value is attributed to the household welfare aggregate.
ksv,t(a)={1 if s=00 if s>0
CF=0 if household does not purchase the durable good during time t (i.e., s>0),
CFt=P0v,t, otherwise.
P0v,t captures the current value of all services provided by the durable good. So,...
This approach assigns the household the entire stream of current and future productive services of the durable in year t.
the acquisition approach is clearly distortionary: it underestimates the welfare of households that owns used durable goods with respect to households who happened to purchase durable goods in the current year
both the level and the budget shares of durables tend to mirror the business cycle. (Why?) Because, households tend to postpone the purchase of durables when the economy slows down, and to increase it when the economy boosts
If a complete set of markets for the services of durables exists, we can use the market rental value of the goods.
ksv,t(r)=Rv,tPsv,t where,
Rv,t is the market rental value of the v-year old durable good.
Rv,tPsv,t rental ratio with respect to the market value of the durable owned by the household, also known as capitalization rate.
CFt=Rv,t
If markets are competitive and the economy is in equilibrium, then the market rental value Rv,t measures the consumption flow from the durable owned by the household. (without including taxes and transaction costs)
(a) one must assume the existence of a complete set of markets for the services of the durables owned by the household;
(b) markets must be competitive and
(c) the economy must be in equilibrium.
If assumption (a) does not hold we cannot apply the method and if one of the other two assumptions is violated the market rental value does not reflect necessarily the household welfare gain from using the durable in period t.
The annual cost of holding the stock of each durable good is based on a conceptual experiment in which the household buys the durable good at the beginning of each year t, and then sell it at the end of the year t+1.
UCt=(1+rt)psv,t−ps+1v+1,t
Where, rt is the real interest rate in period t.
The user cost can be interpreted as the opportunity cost of owning for one period the durable good instead of selling it at the beginning of period t.
95 reports Focus on user cost
Calculate the (annual) user cost of a watch that you purchased at $25 a year ago, and it is worth $20 right now. Assume that real interest rate is 10%.
25-20=5, 25*(10%)=$2.5, $7.5 user cost per year (5)/25=20%
The previous equation could be rewritten as follow for the total number of durables,
UC=D∑d=1(Std×ptd(it−πt+δd))
St: Quantity of the durable
pt: Price of the durable at the time of purchase
it: Nominal interest rate
πt: Inflation rate
δ: Depreciation rate
D: Total number of durables considered
Nominal interest rate (it): There are many options. The most common are:
Interest rate on safe assets like yields of government bonds (If one assumes that risk aversion and wealth are negatively correlate (Arrow 1971) ).
Interest rates on loans of durable goods like cars or other major durables.
Nominal interest rate (it): There are many options. The most common are:
Interest rate on safe assets like yields of government bonds (If one assumes that risk aversion and wealth are negatively correlate (Arrow 1971) ).
Interest rates on loans of durable goods like cars or other major durables.
Quantity of the durable (St): Comes from the survey. Sometimes it is not available.
Nominal interest rate (it): There are many options. The most common are:
Interest rate on safe assets like yields of government bonds (If one assumes that risk aversion and wealth are negatively correlate (Arrow 1971) ).
Interest rates on loans of durable goods like cars or other major durables.
Quantity of the durable (St): Comes from the survey. Sometimes it is not available.
Price of the durable at the time of purchase (pt): Comes from the survey.
Nominal interest rate (it): There are many options. The most common are:
Interest rate on safe assets like yields of government bonds (If one assumes that risk aversion and wealth are negatively correlate (Arrow 1971) ).
Interest rates on loans of durable goods like cars or other major durables.
Quantity of the durable (St): Comes from the survey. Sometimes it is not available.
Price of the durable at the time of purchase (pt): Comes from the survey.
Inflation rate (πt): Generally, the CPI is used.
Nominal interest rate (it): There are many options. The most common are:
Interest rate on safe assets like yields of government bonds (If one assumes that risk aversion and wealth are negatively correlate (Arrow 1971) ).
Interest rates on loans of durable goods like cars or other major durables.
Quantity of the durable (St): Comes from the survey. Sometimes it is not available.
Price of the durable at the time of purchase (pt): Comes from the survey.
Inflation rate (πt): Generally, the CPI is used.
Depreciation rate (δ): Tricky part that will be discussed bellow
In general, the relationship between the price in t of the good v-year old, (pv,t), and its market value as new, (p0,t), may be described as,
pv,t=v∏i=1(1−δi)p0,t
This relationship depends on the sequence {δi}vi=1, which has many ways of calculate it.
Geometric depreciation model
Straight line depreciation
"light bulb" depreciation
Mixture depreciation model
For a longer discussion of all the methods see Amendola and Vecchi (2014).
In general, the relationship between the price in t of the good v-year old, (pv,t), and its market value as new, (p0,t), may be described as,
pv,t=v∏i=1(1−δi)p0,t
This relationship depends on the sequence {δi}vi=1, which has many ways of calculate it.
Geometric depreciation model
Straight line depreciation
"light bulb" depreciation
Mixture depreciation model
For a longer discussion of all the methods see Amendola and Vecchi (2014).
We assume that the depreciation rate is constant over time, so δi=δ for every i.
Estimation of depreciation rate:
δ−π=1−(pv,tpo,t)1v
In order to minimize the influence of any outliers in the data, it is better to use the median value of depreciation rates of all the goods collected in the survey.
Thus, household-specific values are not recommended.
Current Value for each item = pdt
Age of each item in years = T
value of the item when new is not available
Nominal interest rate = rt
Inflation rate = πt
Calculate the average age of each durable good ˉv
Estimate the average lifetime of each durable good as 2ˉv
The, the remaining life of each good is 2ˉv−v
a rough estimate would be δ−π=1−(pv,t2ˉv−v)1v
Due to high data requirement, measurement errors can be considerable.
The user cost approach take no account of often considerable transaction costs (e.g., buying and selling durable goods)
Durable goods
withstand wear and tear or decay
used over a relatively long period
We measure durables because
Poor households purchase durable goods
Ensure utility consistency
We are interested in the use of a durable good that contributes to welfare
Data requirements are high – simplifying assumptions may be necessary.
Takes no account of often considerable transaction costs
Key References
Definition: What are durables?
Why measure durables?
How to measure durables?
Flow of services
User cost of durables
Data requirements
Caveats
Conclusion
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |